Why is a California forest fire so rare?

In the years leading up to last summer’s massive fire in the central and eastern U.S., scientists had predicted the fires would be among the most destructive in recorded history.

They also predicted that the wildfire season would be unusually long and scorching.

But as wildfires across the country have exploded, the prediction has been met with skepticism.

Some scientists say the fire seasons are too short, others that the long-term outlook for fires is too gloomy, and others say the prediction was overblown.

But the debate over the fires’ future has become a major topic in the science community, and scientists are now engaged in a debate over how much time the fires have to burn to trigger climate change.

The fire season in California, the epicenter of the fires, is scheduled to end in November.

It’s the longest fire season on record, with fire suppression officials anticipating at least two more weeks of scorching weather.

But scientists say there is a lot more time left to act.

The fires are a testament to the power of human nature, said Dr. Michael E. Mann, director of the Earth System Science Center at Pennsylvania State University.

The number of fires in the U.K., for instance, has been declining for years.

That’s why scientists are increasingly worried about how much longer it will take to slow global warming.

“We’re running out of time,” said Mann, a former climate scientist and climate scientist at Penn State.

“The fires are not going to be gone in a year.

They are going to keep burning, and they are going and they will keep burning for some time to come.”

The National Park Service says it’s too early to predict how much more fire will burn in the coming months.

“In California, as in the United States, the season is a matter of local weather and conditions,” the park service said in a statement.

“California has historically had a particularly extreme fire season, with many fires beginning in mid-September.

Our fire season has been especially long, with fires burning from early June through late November.

We are confident that this fire season will continue to be a challenging, but ultimately manageable, event.

As California continues to experience a severe fire season and the fires continue to burn, the impacts of climate change will be felt even more profoundly than in previous years.

In the coming weeks and months, we will be watching the fires closely and are actively engaged in the effort to prevent wildfires from becoming a problem for California residents and visitors.”

The fires burned through the Central Valley, where farmers and ranchers struggle to survive amid drought.

In northern California, they burned through California’s western Sierra Nevada foothills, killing more than 500 people.

The wildfires also sparked a massive wildfire in the far northern Rocky Mountains that forced the closure of the National Park System.

The heat wave was also felt across much of the country, including parts of New England, New York, and Pennsylvania.

In New York City, a wildfire burning near Lake Ontario killed at least six people.

At least seven people died in the state of Maryland, according to the state Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

In California, officials said the fire season was longer than in years past.

The National Weather Service said the fires in California began in mid to late September.

Fire season dates were revised on Thursday to begin Oct. 13, and will run through the end of October.

‘I feel like an idiot’: Human-Ecology Theory and the Philippines’ economic and environmental crises

Philippines’ economy is suffering from a massive shortage of human resources.

A growing population, rising crime rates, and rampant corruption have left a workforce vulnerable to exploitation.

And because many Filipinos have been living on the sidelines of the global economic crisis, the country is now dealing with the effects of globalisation as well.

But despite these challenges, some are optimistic that the Philippines will soon recover from the global recession.

In this interview, Maria Elena Banda, the author of the new book Human Ecology Theory: The Science and Practice of Human-Environmental Theory, talks to The Washington Press Club about the impact of globalization on our lives, the economic situation of the country, and what she sees as the future of Philippine society.

In the book, you argue that the Philippine economy has not recovered from the crisis of 2008, and that the government’s economic policies have created an economic system in which “we are a captive economy.”

Can you explain what you mean by that?

A lot of people who are working on this book are people who think that our economy is in a very bad state.

The problem is that our society is being very rigid.

We have a lot of restrictions on what we can say and how we can express ourselves.

There are many things that are illegal, and even if they are legal, people are still being punished.

The Philippines is not a free society.

And yet, even after the financial crisis, there was an attempt to loosen these restrictions and loosen them a bit.

And I think that there’s an idea that it’s not only the current government, but the previous governments that are doing this.

We need to change our economy.

The economic system is very rigid in the Philippines.

In order to survive in the global economy, you have to work hard.

And working hard is hard, especially when you live on the margins.

I’ve been in the business of business and politics for over 20 years.

I have seen many countries that have tried to do things that were not working in order to succeed.

But there’s always a limit.

In the Philippines, it’s still very rigid because of the economic policies.

I think it’s the economic system that is limiting our freedom.

We are a hostage economy.

The economy is so rigid that there is not much opportunity for growth.

It’s a hostage system.

People are not allowed to go outside.

They have to have permits to work.

They can’t leave the country.

We cannot change our economic structure.

We can’t get rid of this system.

And then, because of this, we have been caught in this trap of a system that allows us to live in a way that we can’t imagine.

Do you think that the current political system will succeed in getting rid of the current economic system?

Or will the current system continue to be there for the foreseeable future?

If you look at the political landscape, I think the Philippine political system is the most stable, most stable in the world.

It has always been that way.

And in order for that system to be stable, it needs a stable economy.

That means that the economy needs to be healthy.

And the economy is very unhealthy.

And this is one of the reasons why we have the problems that we have.

So, the problem is not just in the government, because the government needs to change.

The government is not able to change itself.

But I do believe that the next Philippine government, or the next president, will be able to solve the problem.

I believe that it will.

But if you look to the past, I would say that the problems in the past have been a lot more structural and were a lot deeper.

There was a lot corruption and it was very bad.

And when I looked at the Philippines in my lifetime, there were not many countries with problems that were as serious as ours.

The world was really, really different.

So I believe the next government is going to have to change in order not to repeat the mistakes of the past.

So will the next administration be able, and if it’s going to be a government, will it be able or willing to be the change we need?

Or is the current Philippine political structure going to remain the same?

And if it is, will we see the same economic growth that we had in the 1990s?

Or would it be more sustainable and maybe even positive?

In the book Human Ecology Theory, you write that globalization has created an environment in which the Philippines has become a captive economic system.

Do you see this as a positive or negative thing?

I think the negative is that the economic problems of the Philippines are a result of the globalization that is occurring, which is not the reason that the Filipino economy has suffered.

But globalization is creating problems in other countries.

So if you think about it, the Philippines is in one of those countries.

We’re talking about Malaysia, Singapore,